whats better?

would you prefer to have a N/a engine, turbod engine or a superchargered engine?

which is better in your opinion and why

id go for turbo'd if i could

vrooooom tish only reason lol

yeah turbo all the way in my eyes, but do love a good n/a car myself with the roar of 250bhp plus on throttle bodies and carbs, can be quicker than a turbo car of same power lol

Definetely a supercharger especially on a classic mini with straight cut gears love the wining noise it makes

in all honesty i can't choose between the 3, they're each best at a certain application, turbo for the fact that it can make an engine produce some serious power, especially in the case of the evo 8 fq400, the supercharger has the classic whine and works best on super size v8's (koenigsegg ccx, mustangs, monaro vxr 500 etc) and n/a is good because even though you generally won't make more power than a forced induction engine of the same capacity throttle bodies sound properly nice, you dont get turbo lag, or a whine (which lets face it is gonna become annoying after a while) also theres less to go wrong with an n/a engine

well said mate couldnt agree with you better on that but just wondering what everyones opinions are, i mean i would always have n/a or turbo, bet turbo cars dont have to be laggy if they specd right.

i'd probably prefer a turbo. i think its gives a better driving effect, but thn i dont know what im moaning about!!

i would go n/a as im a bmw man lol

xr2irhys wrote:id go for turbo'd if i could

vrooooom tish only reason lol

That what i meant, what he said! ^
Vrooom tish, (big smile )

I would have to say N/A only because every turbo'd car I ve owned has never lasted. They certainly dont suit my driving characteristics.

can i pick all three :d lol

driven all 3
n/a easy far less to go wrong
want my stepdads aircooled dub buggy on twin carbs and 2 cherry bomb 'zorsts mmmm summer here we come!!